Creating a non-superficial global cinema will require
finally figuring out truly universal values of a planetary culture. These values derive from human biology.
Capturing and holding audiences from all the continents isn't easy. Many have tried.
Modern
mass entertainment often serves as a deeper and more important global
language than English. That is because present day Hollywood industry
inadvertently created a process that increasingly touches upon basic
physiological human needs and aspirations. Profit driven use of visuals,
characters, and themes (that were scientifically researched to be as
marketable and appealing to widest possible multi-ethnic audience) is
steadily pushing towards a universal formula. Although we're still at a
point where the appealing "supranational" characteristics of mainstream
Hollywood involve the usual (explosions, special effects, sex appeal,
mental escape through hyperindividualistic protagonists, etc), we will
begin to see deeper basic cinematic themes emerge that cut across all
cultures in the near future. The basic reasons will be:
1)
Same corporate profit motive that gave us the rise of neuromarketing
will push for figuring out physiological substrata that makes
simultaneous global release movies more emotionally appealing. Digital
piracy will make physical movie spaces ever more important for revenue
generation. Conversion of movie theaters into expensive
3D/concert/theater type spectacles will need research to be successful.
You WILL be satisfied with the global release whether you're in Nigeria,
Japan, Ecuador, Texas, etc.
2) Emerging Internet culture finding its way to the mainstream as globe trotting generation Y takes charge of the industry.
3)
Dawning realization by Western elites that globalization has stalled.
Their scramble to rethink and proactively improve globalization and its
integrative forces. Goal of preventing a major and rapid slide into
mercantilist (potentially even hostile!) continental economic blocks
will see elite efforts to create stronger intercontinental "glue".
Efforts towards discovery of media/art/Internet driven truly global
culture should be part of the effort. Most states currently subsidize
their movie industries behind the scenes as national propaganda PR
moves. This practice can be turned on its head if applied towards
supranational themes and purposes.
The spread of this Hollywood
lingua franca is a microcosm of globalization itself. When analyzing
integrative processes of globalization, special attention should be
given to the film industry in particular.
Until relatively
recently, Hollywood released its mega movies domestically first and
abroad only months later. Then, to combat immediate digital piracy from
places like China it became a more common practice to have simultaneous
global openings for very big budget titles. The preparation and
logistical coordination of this represented stage three in the emergence
of a truly globalized film industry.
Lets briefly go through the stages:
1) 1950s-1980s:
Mass cultural exports of the post-war period. Influx of Hollywood
products into occupied territories and satellite states. Increasing
cooperation between West European studios/agencies and Hollywood
resulting in an international entertainment business sphere. Some partial
work done on "universal" values within the ideological framing context
of the cold war. Both Western and Soviet intelligence have a heavy role
in informational shaping of entertainment to influence perceptions of
the present world and prime expectations of how the world's future will
develop (the dystopian-utopian spectrum of how the 21st century was
popularly portrayed in movies is an interesting example of this).
Genuine attempt at discovering universal values is hidden and distorted
by individual private and corporate interests behind the militaries of
the NATO pact.
2) 1980s-1990s: Hollywood studios rapidly
expand beyond NATO's sphere of influence and become truly global as most
markets are now accessible. Majority of key studio revenue now comes
from abroad. Consolidation in number of transnational media corporations
that own the studios. Streamlining of their operations along lines of
fellow tangible good producing transnational companies. Rapid horizontal
creation of international links to reduce costs and create an immediate
global reservoir of cheaper talent, locations, and equipment. Actors
and actresses become supranational super celebrities recognized
anywhere. Global businesses are increasingly synchronized in space and
time.
3) 2000- present: Merging of dozens of national and
regional markets into one planetary market that allows rapid global
penetration and hype generation (via local auxiliaries). Simultaneous
global cinema and disc openings. "Epic" large cash infusion Hollywood
movie making style is rapidly emulated by other players like Beijing and
Moscow. Besides profit, this is partially done to increase their soft
power and control domestically. For non-Western (particularly BRIC)
powers to be successful with their mass media projects, they need to
absorb/buy Hollywood's cutting edge technical, CGI, and art talent. That
is already happening and is currently causing peripheral cooperation/merging between movie studios of all key regional political powers on earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment